So, for those of us ready to concede we cannot beat the market after taxes, fees and commissions, there are no-load passively-managed major-index-tracking ETF’s. 2 ways to track the S&P 500: SPIDRs (symbol:SPY) & VANGUARD INDEX TRUST 500 INDEX (symbol:VFINX)
SPIDRs are depository receipts, so not technically an ETF – but does that matter? Is one inherently better for the individual investor?
Here’s how their profiles stack up:
Expense SPY Category Avg
Total Expense Ratio 0.08% N/A
Annual Holdings Turnover 3% 26.96
Total Net Assets 62.70B 1.64B
Expense VFINX Category Avg
Total Expense Ratio: 0.15% 1.10%
Max 12b1 Fee: 0.00% N/A
Max Front End Sales Load: 0.00% 5.24%
Max Deferred Sales Load: 0.00% 2.61%
3 Yr Expense Projection*: $48 $573
5 Yr Expense Projection*: $85 $868
10 Yr Expense Projection*: $192 $1,726
Both are cheap, and both let you buy the equivalent of the same great index.
Is there some reason to pay the .07% extra to buy Vanguard instead of SPIDRs?
The Lipper Avg. Scorecard is similar for both EXCEPT: SPIDRs only get a 2 out of 5 for Tax Efficiency whereas VFINX gets a 5 out of 5.
Another Difference: Vanguard has a 6% annual turnover while SPY’s rate is 3%. Could this be because VFINX re-allocates twice as often? Is this better for the investor?
These are not rhetorical questions
I really want to know.
Please Advise.
Economic Analysis
Economic Calendar
Real Clear Markets
Undervalued stocks
Value Cruncher
Wikinvest
2 Comments
P.S. – I found this even-cheaper s&P 500 fund:
Fidelity Spartan 500 Index Advantage (FSMAX)
expense % = .06%
question – could a slightly more-expensive ETF be “better run” than FSMAX and therefore be worth paying a bit more for? Aren’t these all by definition virtual whole-market buyers and as such identical?
@andrew
How does the past performance compare? Since they’re all tracking the same index, any differences in tax efficiency and turnover should be reflected in the past performance graph in the prospectus (usually a 5-year graph of $10,000 hypothetical investment).